Extracting the benefits of transparency while eliminating its detrimental effects requires techniques that are normally reserved for electronic trading platforms. To get the best out of transparency, we need protocols. Applied properly, the right transparency protocols will increase access to information while protecting the proprietary data that can destabilize a market.

Finra last week proposed running a pilot program that would give traders 48 hours before having to reveal their so-called block trades to other investors. The effort would allow the industry-funded brokerage regulator, which is overseen by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, to evaluate how delayed transparency might affect corporate bond trading.

Consider Germany’s Bayer AG, which agreed to buy Monsanto in May 2016 for $66bn in what was then the largest all-cash merger ever announced. The deal was controversial from the start as Bayer was going to need to raise billions. Traditionally, this means going on a roadshow and explaining its plan in great detail. Without evidence of a credible plan, capitalists will not part with their money.

Not the ECB. 

For more than a decade, corporate-bond traders resisted efforts to carry out more transactions electronically even as most other corners of financial markets embraced the move to computerized buying and selling. But that’s slowly been changing as new rules have forced dealers to act more like machines, linking up buyers and sellers in almost real time as an exchange would, instead of buying securities from investors and hanging onto them.

The tech leader in this space right now handles 95% of all electronic bond deals. But that is still less than 20% of all bond trades made today.

Citigroup and JPMorgan Chase have closed down desks dedicated to handing smaller orders as Wall Street continues to cut costs on trading floors. The two banks have shuttered their odd-lot trading desks in recent months and started executing such trades electronically instead, according to people with knowledge of the
matter. 

We’re not the first firm to sound an alarm bell over liquidity in the fixed-income credit markets. Indeed, that bell has been ringing non-stop since the since the collapse of Lehman Brothers. The risk has only grown in recent years as regulations pushed market makers out of the business, in spite of record growth in the size of the corporate bond market.

The stakes are huge for Wall Street banks competing in the $22 trillion market for U.S. Treasuries and corporate debt and the $5.1 trillion-a-day foreign-exchange market. Handling fixed-income products remains one of industry’s biggest revenue generators. Now firms must disrupt the old model by building out their electronic platforms, or they risk getting sidelined in the future.

Business Insider got a look at Trumid’s investor presentation, which gives an inside look at what it’s like to start a venue that matches bond buyers and sellers using technology. As you can see from the slides, it’s not easy. Volumes, at least in the beginning, can be hard to find.

Life insurers have been moving more of their $7 trillion of investments into riskier securities, data show. That could hurt some insurers’ credit ratings in the next recession according to Fitch Ratings.