Bringing voices together to promote well functioning markets
Every Friday, we send you an email of top articles related to corporate bond market development. The newsletter is a free service.
Sign Up!
Join Discussion ⌄

A Handful of Giant Investors Have the Fate of the Bond Market in Their Hands – Business Insider

Author: \ October 28, 2016 \ 6 Comments
Full Article: Business Insider

The top five investment companies hold $264 billion in US high-yield bonds, according to a big report from Stephen Caprio and Matthew Mish at UBS. That’s equivalent to 20% of the market. The top 20 hold $605 billion, equivalent to 46%

Comments
  • Merlin
    MerlinOctober 28, 2016"Hi Wolfie, I am not sure I agree with point #3 stating that execution fees have been driven down due to technology. MarketAxess is trading what, 80,, 85, 90% of corporate bond volume in N.A. and don't think their fees have budged. And I am not aware of any of the existing ATS fees being reduced. I think maybe NYSE reduced fees but no one uses them anyways and Bloomberg didn't reduce theirs because they don't charge anything to begin with. I do agree that technology ha…"
  • Merlin
    MerlinOctober 28, 2016"The article makes already well know points. The question regarding the fate of the bond market is how these mutual funds actually manage their funds and if they are making appropriate changes to cushion themselves against an onslaught of potential redemptions. While carrying larger cash balances may be more prudent in terms of protecting their investors, there is negative incentive to do this as it materially reduces the return provided by the fund. While this is like…"
  • Goose
    GooseOctober 28, 2016"Agreed Slider. It was quite interesting how Blackrock enjoyed the asset growth banquet, but in 2014 began to voice their opinion on liquidity http://i.imgur.com/4rSna2d.gif Then the SEC began to consider the concept of regulating the buy side as significantly important finanancial institutions, and the message has become. http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view2/20141110/5135504/remain-calm-o.gif…"
  • Slider
    SliderOctober 28, 2016"I am continually hearing anecdotes of how the big funds are being allocated egregious shares of new issue deals which exacerbates this inequity. The market should now be considering the "too big to fail" theory as it relates to the buy-side it seems.…"
View More Comments
Join the Discussion

Leave a Reply

6 Comments on "A Handful of Giant Investors Have the Fate of the Bond Market in Their Hands – Business Insider"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Cougar
Member
Cougar

The bond ownership distribution is already a significant problem now. Forgetting market conventions and norms, materially large funds will receive better pricing of trades – disadvantaging the smaller funds’ investors – provide market liquidity risk and hold sway over market development.
1. Better pricing leads us all to increased regulation and therefore ironically costs for all investors and greater barriers of entry.
2. Liquidity risk is a self-fulfilling black hole and merely a question of when.
3. Any market development changes will be in the oligopoly’s interests – a further detriment to market behavior.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
1 year ago
Wolfman
Member
Wolfman
1. We have regulatory pressures, increasing costs and decreasing revenues driving consolidation across the industry. 2. Most investors own credit products via mutual funds and an increasingly large number of ETFs. 3. Technology has driven down execution fees and opened the market to a broader audience (see #2). 4. The 24-hour news cycle coverage of the markets encourages investors to trade more often. 5. The role of Dealers to buy-when-everyone-is-selling-and-sell-when-everyone-is-buying has changed (see #1). 6. Rates are well below historical averages and more likely to go higher than lower. Summary. Liquidity events present risks and opportunities. Historically, the Dealers were… Read more »
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
1 year ago
Merlin
Member
Merlin
Hi Wolfie, I am not sure I agree with point #3 stating that execution fees have been driven down due to technology. MarketAxess is trading what, 80,, 85, 90% of corporate bond volume in N.A. and don’t think their fees have budged. And I am not aware of any of the existing ATS fees being reduced. I think maybe NYSE reduced fees but no one uses them anyways and Bloomberg didn’t reduce theirs because they don’t charge anything to begin with. I do agree that technology has led to certain entities participating more vigorously in the market. M
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
1 year ago
Slider
Member
Slider

I am continually hearing anecdotes of how the big funds are being allocated egregious shares of new issue deals which exacerbates this inequity. The market should now be considering the “too big to fail” theory as it relates to the buy-side it seems.

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
1 year ago
Goose
Member
Goose

Agreed Slider. It was quite interesting how Blackrock enjoyed the asset growth banquet, but in 2014 began to voice their opinion on liquidity

” />

Then the SEC began to consider the concept of regulating the buy side as significantly important finanancial institutions, and the message has become.

” />

Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
1 year ago
Merlin
Member
Merlin
The article makes already well know points. The question regarding the fate of the bond market is how these mutual funds actually manage their funds and if they are making appropriate changes to cushion themselves against an onslaught of potential redemptions. While carrying larger cash balances may be more prudent in terms of protecting their investors, there is negative incentive to do this as it materially reduces the return provided by the fund. While this is likely a positive in the long run, as usual, people are focused on the short term. Money managers need to get back to managing… Read more »
Vote Up0Vote Down  Reply
1 year ago
Related Posts

Blackrock’s Richard Prager: The Liquidity Is Out There – Institutional Investor

March 18, 2016

Everyone is Worried About the Thing Markets Need Most, But They’re Not Asking the Right Questions – Business Insider

March 25, 2016

US Companies Overpaying for Bonds; Banks May Be to Blame – Reuters

March 31, 2016