MerlinOctober 23, 2015"Now you know what happened to liquidity. People tried and continue to try to turn the art into a science. I am not suggesting the markets need to revert to policies and protocols from the 80's. The 90's and early 2000's are goo enough where there was much better balance between buy and sell side accounts. What I find fascinating about today is the reluctance of people to share information feeling that this information will be used against them. Without information, ma…"
Now you know what happened to liquidity. People tried and continue to try to turn the art into a science. I am not suggesting the markets need to revert to policies and protocols from the 80’s. The 90’s and early 2000’s are goo enough where there was much better balance between buy and sell side accounts. What I find fascinating about today is the reluctance of people to share information feeling that this information will be used against them. Without information, market makers are not going to be able to be as aggressive or consistent at providing liquidity (on top… Read more »
Comments
Now you know what happened to liquidity. People tried and continue to try to turn the art into a science. I am not suggesting the markets need to revert to policies and protocols from the 80’s. The 90’s and early 2000’s are goo enough where there was much better balance between buy and sell side accounts. What I find fascinating about today is the reluctance of people to share information feeling that this information will be used against them. Without information, market makers are not going to be able to be as aggressive or consistent at providing liquidity (on top… Read more »
Related Posts
S&P: All That Bond Market Illiquidity is Bad for Bond Funds, But Not Banks – Bloomberg
July 1, 2015Bankers and Regulators Voice Fears on Bond Market Volatility
May 6, 2015BCG Report – Adapting to Digital Advances: Global Capital Markets 2015
May 14, 2015